Endnotes While millions of people have gained coverage through the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act ACAstate decisions not to implement the expansion leave many without an affordable coverage option. This expansion fills in historical gaps in Medicaid eligibility for adults and was envisioned as the vehicle for extending insurance coverage to low-income individuals, with premium tax credits for Marketplace coverage serving as the vehicle for covering people with moderate incomes. While the Medicaid expansion was intended to be national, the June Supreme Court ruling essentially made it optional for states. As of June17 states had not expanded their programs.
Press release A more recent version of this report is available at epi. What this report finds: Income inequality has risen in every state since the s and in many states is up in the post—Great Recession era. In 24 states, the top 1 percent captured at least half of all income growth between andand in 15 of those states, the top 1 percent captured all income growth.
In another 10 states, top 1 percent incomes grew in the double digits, while bottom 99 percent incomes fell. For the United States overall, the top 1 percent captured In the top 1 percent of families nationally made Rising inequality is not just a story of those in the financial sector in the greater New York City metropolitan area reaping outsized rewards from speculation in financial markets.
While New York and Connecticut are the most unequal states as measured by the ratio of top 1 percent to bottom 99 percent income innine states, 54 metropolitan areas, and counties have gaps wider than the national gap.
Explore inequality by state, county, and metro area in this interactive feature. What we can do to fix the problem: The rise of top incomes relative to the bottom 99 percent represents a sharp reversal of the trend that prevailed in the midth century.
Between andthe share of income held by the top 1 percent declined in every state except Alaska where the top 1 percent held a relatively low share of income throughout the period. This earlier era was characterized by a rising minimum wage, low levels of unemployment after the s, widespread collective bargaining in private industries manufacturing, transportation [trucking, airlines, and railroads], telecommunications, and constructionand a cultural and political environment in which it was outrageous for executives to receive outsized bonuses while laying off workers.
We need policies that return the economy to full employment, return bargaining power to U. Executive summary While economic inequality has been one of the hottest topics this presidential campaign season, much of the focus has been on the fortunes of the top 1 percent at the national level.
This report, our third annual such analysis, uses the latest available data to examine how the top 1 percent in each state have fared over —, with an emphasis on trends over — This third edition includes two new elements: We examine top incomes by metropolitan area and county in Our analysis provides a number of major findings that confirm the widespread extent and growth of income inequality that is heightening economic anxiety among the American electorate: Inincome inequality was much higher in many states, metropolitan areas, and counties than for the United States overall.
Nine states had gaps wider than the national gap. In the most unequal states—New York, Connecticut, and Wyoming—the top 1 percent earned average incomes more than 40 times those of the bottom 99 percent.
Fifty-four of metropolitan areas had gaps wider than the national gap. In the 12 most unequal metropolitan areas, the average income of the top 1 percent was at least 40 times greater than the average income of the bottom 99 percent.
Most unequal was the Jackson metropolitan area, which spans Wyoming and Idaho; there the top 1 percent in earned on average times the average income of the bottom 99 percent of families.
The average income of the top 1 percent was at least 45 times greater than the average income of the bottom 99 percent in 25 counties.
In Teton, Wyoming which is one of two counties in the Jackson metropolitan areathe top 1 percent in earned on average times the average income of the bottom 99 percent of families. There is a wide variance in what it means to be in the top 1 percent by state, metro area, and county.
Twelve states, metro areas, and counties have thresholds above that level. While incomes at all levels declined as a result of the Great Recession, income growth has been lopsided since the recovery began in ; the top 1 percent captured an alarming share of economic growth while enjoying relatively high income growth.
Between andthe top 1 percent captured Over this period, the average income of the top 1 percent grew 4Americans are relatively unconcerned about the wide income gap between rich and poor. Americans in the upper fifth of the income distribution earn times as much as those in the lowest fifth — by far the widest such gap among the 10 advanced countries in the Pew Research Center’s global attitudes survey.
Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do - Expanded Edition [Andrew Gelman] on leslutinsduphoenix.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
On the night of the presidential election, Americans watched on television as polling results divided the nation's map into red and blue states. Since then the color divide has become symbolic of a culture war that. I am 35 years old—the oldest millennial, the first millennial—and for a decade now, I’ve been waiting for adulthood to kick in.
My rent consumes nearly half my income, I haven’t had a steady job since Pluto was a planet and my savings are dwindling faster than the ice caps the baby boomers melted. Math Winter Recitation Handout 3: The Gap Between Rich and Poor The specific learning goals of this activity are for you to: analysis of IRS data showed that the top , earners in the United States collectively brought home as much money as the bottom reported on ABS News9 that the gap between rich and poor in the United.
The growing gap between rich and poor is affecting many aspects of life in the United States, from health to work to home life. Now the one place that’s supposed to give Americans an equal chance at life — the schoolhouse — is becoming increasingly unequal as well.
I’ve already documented. The widening income achievement gap is a symptom of a confluence of trends that have accompanied and exacerbated widening income inequality in the United States over the last four decades.
But it is a symptom with real and important consequences.