Board of Education decision passed in and the Montgomery Bus Boycott of In addition there were movies adopted in other countries to this scenario. The plot of the movie revolves around 12 jurors, who after the court hearing have to come to a verdict on a murder case. They are presented with the murder case where teenage boy allegedly killed his abusive father and fled the scene.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. In the beginning, all of the evidence points to him being guilty. However, after a little bit of analysis of the evidence, there is some reasonable doubt. Slowly all of the Jurors accept the boy as innocent except for one very stubborn juror: The differences and similarities between the stage directions and the directors shot selection in the film and in the text affect the readers interpretation of the final scene where Juror 3 says not guilty greatly.
There are many similarities between the two versions. One similarity is how the jurors reacted to Juror 3s resistance to the chance of the boy being innocent. In both the play and the film, the jurors simply stare at Juror 3 out of amazement of his ignorance to the facts.
When Juror 8 asks him why he still isnt convinced, Juror 3 says that its his right.
He also says that he is entitled to his opinion. This similarity helps add to the question to why Juror 3 is so bent on getting the boy convicted. Another similarity is that Juror 8 seems confident that Juror 3 will pull through his mindset of the boy being guilty.
In the play, the playwright says that Juror 8 asks Juror 3 of his arguments calmly and quietly. Juror 8 does the same in the film.
Juror 8s calmness and quietness seems to show that he is confident about the verdict and that he can convince Juror 3 that the boy is innocent. The final similarity being discussed will be about how Juror 3s tone of voice affected the readers inference of his character.
In the play the playwrights directions for Juror 3 are mostly loudly or shouting.
The same is in the movie. Juror 3 is constantly yelling and shouting, trying to make a point. From this the reader can infer that Juror 3 gets angered quickly and is stubborn at times. He also thinks his opinion is more important than the others because he only stressed his opinion and not the others.
This detail alone suggests Juror 3 is hard to work with. The similarities brought out many good details in the story and the characters. There are also many differences between the text and film. One of them is how Juror 3 admits the boy is not guilty.
In the play, all Reginald Rose wrote was that Juror 3 began to pound on the desk and seemed about to cry. He then said, Not guilty. The reader may think that Juror 3 felt overpowered by everyone and felt weak as opposed to 11 other people who had different viewpoints on the case.
One may also think that Juror 3 got tired of the case and just wanted to leave. In the movie however, Juror 3 is shown ripping his sons picture up with trembling hands and then crying. He also mentions how he worked his life out into his son, but for what? He got punched in the face and never saw his son again.
From this small scene the reader can infer that Juror 3s stubborn behavior was all caused by the grief of his son. It seemed as if Juror 3 realized that he shouldnt punish the boy because of the memories he had of his son.
Another difference is when Juror 3 is yelling at the others and angrily asking them how they can believe that the boy is innocent. The director does many choker shots of Juror 3 to show his facial expressions.
His facial expressions express lots of anger towards the boy and the jurors. In the play there is no way to see the extent of the anger of the jurors because the play can only account for movements and tone of voice. In the movie Juror 3 just keeps saying not guilty without a valid reason until he talks about his son.The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is a film about twelve jurors in a murder trial deliberating the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt.
Juror #7- The Christ Figure. In the classic film, ’12 Angry Men’, the writer, Reginald Rose, portrays the antagonist, Juror #7, as a Christ figure. Twelve Angry Men is based on a short teleplay that was produced around the time of Civil Rights Movement along with the Brown vs.
Board of Education decision passed in and the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 12 Angry Men Analysis 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial.
An 18 year old has been accused of murdering his father and the jury has retired to determine his fate. Apr 17, · 12 Angry Men Analysis 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial.
An 18 year old has been accused of murdering his father and the jury has retired to determine his fate. Essay on Analysis Of The Film ' 12 Angry Men ' - The film “12 Angry Men”, produced in , was filmed in a New York City courthouse, with a majority of the filming taking place in the jury room.